Titanium back in reckoning

Titanium back in reckoning

But technical hurdles make processing difficult, though India has 21 per cent of global deposits

 It’s as strong as steel, more durable than and has a higher fashion quotient than platinum when it comes to avant garde jewellery. It’s titanium, nicknamed the “space-age metal” for its widespread use in airlines and defence because of its lightweight and durable nature. Only a handful of countries boasts of deposits and India is one of them, with 21 per cent of the global deposits along its 7,000-km coastline.

Over the past decade, many companies have set out to mine the metal. Tata had planned a Rs 2,500-crore titanium dioxide project in Tamil Nadu, but was forced to put it on the back burner in 2007 after it ran into land problems. More recently in 2013, signed a memorandum of understanding with Kerala Minerals & Metals for a Rs 5,000-crore joint venture to make titanium sponge. That project too is languishing. But with a $150-billion window of opportunity in defence equipment with the government’s ‘Make-in-India’ push, titanium is back in the reckoning.

NOT SO SHINING
  • India has 21 per cent of the world’s titanium bearing minerals
  • Extant along the Indian coastline
  • Of the 7,000km, only 2,500km has been explored
  • India’s installed capacity is 1 per cent; 75 per cent is met through imports
  • Per capita consumption is 0.15 kg compared to 5 kg in developed countries

Last week, representatives from the attended a pre-bid meeting of the Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation, or APMDC, to develop heavy mineral sands, or deposits of the metal along the beach. So did Dubai-headquartered, Trimex group, and eight other companies, says Consultant P Panduranga Rao.

Among the other major groups interested in titanium is Sajjan Jindal-controlled JSW Steel. “It’s a project we are studying,” says Jindal, chairman and managing director of the steel major.

Bharat Forge has already inked a multi-year contract with Boeing Commercial Airplane to supply titanium forgings for Boeing’s next generation 737 and 737 MAX airplanes. The Indian company’s facilities in Pune and Baramati are expected to start supplying the parts to be used in the wings of the plane from the first quarter of 2016. The titanium parts will be heat treated, shaped in a forging press and machined by Bharat Forge before being shipped to Boeing Portland for machining into components. The source of the titanium parts for the project, however, is not known and Bharat Forge didn’t respond to questions sent by Business Standard.

The stages in include extracting ilmenite from beach sand and upgrading it to titanium slag, which then is purified into sponge, and cast into ingots before being processed in mills to make various items. The price increases staggeringly after each step of value addition; if ilmenite is around $600 a tonne, titanium sponge could cost as much as $15,000 a tonne.

Around 95 per cent of the titanium-bearing compounds (titanium dioxide) mined finds use in the paints, paper and plastic industries, and the rest is converted into titanium metal which is used in the aerospace and defence sectors. Despite its many advantages, one problem with the metal is its cost of production. Research reports indicate that the cost of producing titanium metal is around $6 a kg, compared to less than a $1.5 for steel and $2 for aluminium. In India, mining titanium is doubly challenging due to technological bottlenecks.

“The titanium market is oligopolistic in nature. The joint efforts of SAIL, Kerala State Industrial Development Corporate and Kerala Minerals and Metals to obtain technology from leading global suppliers/ manufacturers of titanium sponge is not yet successful and have not been very encouraging,” admits a SAIL spokesperson.

Most of the titanium slag plants currently operate in Canada, South Africa and Norway. While Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Japan, too, produce slag, their production is mainly for captive consumption.

Indian companies find themselves hamstrung by lack of technological know-how. “We were approached by a Russian company a couple of years back. The Russian project was in Odisha. But the main stumbling block is technology,” says Srei Infrastructure Finance Chairman and Managing Director Hemant Kanoria.

Too many pitfalls
APMDC’s Rao, who is inviting companies to participate in an integrated project that includes exploration and mining of titanium, agrees with the cost and technology challenges. APMDC has proposed to develop three heavy mineral beach sand leases. For the project, the private investor would have majority stake, says Rao. Yet more than half the companies that turned up for the pre-bid meeting were local companies based in south India, possibly because others were anxious about the uncertainties involved.

Jindal, however, is more enthusiastic about titanium’s future. “A sound titanium dioxide and metal industry is essential to ensure optimum utilisation of these resources and to develop a vibrant industry. Large investment, research and development and know-how would be extremely essential to develop a world class titanium industry. Moreover, beach sand minerals have been kept out of the auctioning process in the Mines and Minerals Development Act. They need to be allowed as in the case of bulk minerals,” he says.

India has a head start with 21 per cent of the global deposits compared to 10 per cent in the case of coal and less than 10 per cent for iron. Still when it comes to mining, India has just 1 per cent of the installed capacity globally.

Much of this is accounted for by Kerala Minerals and Metals which started construction of titanium dioxide plant in 1979 and commissioned it in 1984. In 2011, it set up a titanium sponge plant and has been a strategic supplier to India’s space missions.

Titanium’s global story took a while to take off. Discovered in 1791, small amounts of the first titanium metal were produced in 1910 and on a commercial basis from 1948. Is India Inc now ready to take a leap of faith?

 

Allowing private sector to mine monazite would boost India REEs

MUMBAI (Metal-Pages) 5-May-15.  India needs to rope in private miners to mine and process monazite if it wants to increase its rare earth production, the Beach Minerals Producers Association (BMPA) said.

Although India has large resources of rare earth-bearing mineral monazite, the country has not been able to exploit these resources found along its coastal areas. There are about 83 mining leases granted for mining beach minerals also known as heavy minerals, but only Indian Rare Earths Ltd (IREL) is processing monazite and producing rare earths. Most of the other miners are focused on titanium and zircon products.

BMPA said that India should permit beach mineral mining lease holders to handle monazite mining too. This would increase the supply of monazite in India. Those miners who are willing to further process monazite to produce rare earths elements should be permitted by the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), with assurance that uranium and thorium should be handed over to government authorities or kept in a separate place for future disposal.

The policy of Beach Mineral is that wholly Indian-owned companies are eligible for mining mineral separation and value added products. The miner has to dispose of any monazite produced at their own cost in accordance with Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) directions. The miner has to blend the monazite tailings with waste sand and refill the mine veins.

BMPA president N Pauldurai Perumal said that without permitting private miners/companies, India cannot increase its production of rare earths.

Currently, only government-owned companies are allowed to process rare earths. Government-owned companies have their own limitations and might not have enough funds to make investments in new rare earth projects, whereas, private companies have fewer limitations and involving private companies would pave the way to import the required technology from developed countries.

This model has been proved successful in the case of titanium bearing metals, when it was opened to private entities in 1998. Permitting private companies to exploit monazite under the direct control of DAE, would be beneficial to the government as it would provide uranium and thorium without any need to make huge investments to mine these resources.

He added that many private companies have shown interest in cracking of monazite for rare earth production. V.V.Mineral of Tamil Nadu, Trimax of Andhra Pradesh and Synthetic Rutile Producer Cochin Minerals and Rutile Pvt Ltd of Kerala have approached the DAE for rare earth production.

-By Samil Surendran in Mumbai (samil.surendran@argusmedia.com)

 

Courtesy : Mr.Samil Surendran at Metal Page

Thorium: the last great opportunity of the industrial age

It is a significant fact that half the protein the world eats has its origin in fossil fuels. We are all aware of the green revolution that, amongst other things, saw dwarf strains of wheat increase yields by a couple of hundred percent. There was another revolution in agriculture sixty years prior to the green revolution. That was the development of the Haber-Bosch process of combining hydrogen and nitrogen to produce nitrogenous fertiliser.

The plants that produce that fertiliser, the source of half of the protein we eat, run on natural gas or coal. One day these fossil fuels will run out. Does that mean that half of our population starves? It does if we don’t have a way of producing nitrogenous fertilisers cheaply using something other than natural gas or coal.

And it won’t be sunbeams or wisps of the wind that will keep people fed. Those things barely pay for themselves, if that. Take the case of the Ivanpah solar facility in California built at a cost of $2.2 billion. Rated at 392 MW, Ivanpah is a near 20-fold scale up from the previous largest solar thermal facility of 20 MW in Spain. Despite all the engineering that went into the design of Ivanpah, it operated at least 40% below design in 2014.

The chief economist of the International Energy Agency, a warmer by the name of Fatih Birol, once said ‘One day we will run out of oil, it is not today or tomorrow, but one day we will run out of oil and we have to leave oil before oil leaves us.” What is true of oil, the liquid fossil fuel, is also true of the solid, coal, and the gaseous form, natural gas. One may quibble about the detail but the overall effect will look something like this:

clip_image002

Figure 1: Fossil Fuel Production 1800 – 2300

Oil production will be the first to start the long decline to oblivion. We can fix the problem of declining transport fuel availability by a form of alchemy that converts coal into gasoline, diesel and jet fuel. And we will be doing that. But it will be another short term fix until the coal runs out. You might think we have a lot of coal. We had a lot of oil too, once – until we burnt it. Converting coal into the transport fuels we need will double the rate of our coal consumption. And our coal endowment will be largely gone in our grandchildren’s lifetimes.

If we combine the data from Figure 1 with world population growth, we get this figure:

clip_image004

Figure 2: Per Capital World Fossil Fuel Production 1800 – 2300

Per capita fossil fuel production falls off a cliff in 2030. Projections of agricultural land available to be brought into production suggest that the system might cope with growing demand at least up until the late 2030s. Fossil fuel availability though indicates that prices will start accelerating well before then.

There is no alternative – nuclear energy is the only energy source that has any prospect of making good the looming fall in energy supply. Only nuclear power has any hope of being cheap enough to provide the energy to cook up the slew of chemicals and fuels we need to maintain our high standard of living. But it won’t be nuclear power as it is commonly understood. That is power plants burning U235 and using water as the coolant. Civilisation took a wrong turn way back in the 1950s when that technology became dominant in the nuclear power industry.

There are a number of reasons why it was a wrong turn. Firstly, U235 is only one thousandth of the nuclear fuel available to us. The best nuclear fuel, thorium, is eight hundred times more abundant. If you like to believe in a Creator who made the earth as a paradise for us to inhabit, U235 is the nuclear match made for us to light the fire that will sustain civilisation indefinitely. We are still burning that nuclear match though and we should have already moved on from that.

The second big problem with nuclear power plants running on U235 is decay heat. You can’t turn off nuclear power plants instantaneously. They continue to produce heat for a while after the reactions have been shut down. If the cooling water doesn’t circulate for some reason during this period, then there is a good chance you will get a hydrogen explosion. This is what happened at Fukushima which had three reactors blow up due to hydrogen explosions.

The question now being asked about thorium reactors is, if they are so wonderful, why haven’t they been developed yet? The only major company that once expressed an interest in developing molten salt thorium reactors was Teledyne Brown. There are a number of startups in the thorium space but none seem to have traction yet.

Perhaps the reason is that nobody has looked past the development of a commercial thorium reactor, a wonderful thing in itself, to the enormous commercial opportunity that follows from that. Let’s assume that each thorium power plant is 250 MWe, the same size as the conceptual design at Oak Ridge National Laboratory 50 years ago. Assuming no economic growth that required a higher rate of build, just replacing declining fossil fuel production to 2100 would require the building of 14,500 units at 250 MWe. The build rate would get to about 300 a year by mid-century. The rate could be 30% to 40% higher than that if carbon-based transport fuels are going to be created from hydrogen from electrolysis and carbon scavenged from forestry and agricultural waste. Also assuming that each unit lasts for sixty years before it has to be replaced, then the ramp up of replacement units in the second half of the century is just as fast as the initial ramp up as per Figure 3 following:

clip_image006

Figure 3: Number of 250 MWe nuclear reactors required by year to 2100

Thorium molten salt reactors, without the need for all the backup safety systems that U235 nuclear plants have, should be no more expensive to build than coal-fired plants. This is an overnight capital cost of $3,246/kW as opposed to U235 nuclear at $5,530/kW. At that rate, a 250 MWe plant would cost about $800 million. Building 300 per annum would provide a revenue of $240 billion per annum.

To put that in perspective, in the first quarter of 2015 the commercial division of Boeing sold 184 aircraft for $15.4 billion. That is an average revenue of $84 million per aircraft. The list price of a 737-800 is $93.3 million. Annualised, Boeing has a revenue of $60 billion per annum from its commercial aircraft division. Our prospective thorium reactor builder would become four times larger in the base case.

That will be the reward for saving humanity from a bleak future by developing the thorium molten salt reactor – owning an enormous industrial enterprise.

Link : http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/05/16/thorium-the-last-great-opportunity-of-the-industrial-age/

 

இந்திய போட்டியை சமாளிக்க முடியாமல் உலகில் No.1 இலுக்கா மைன்ஸ் அதன் சுரங்கத்தை விற்பனை செய்ய முடிவு செய்துள்ளது

http://www.smh.com.au/business/mining-and-resources/iluka-resources-lobs-lowered-bid-for-kenmare-20150430-1mx9p4.html

உலகிலேயே பெரிய தாதுமணல் நிறுவனம் இலுக்கா மைன்ஸ் விலை குறைவு மற்றும் நஷ்டத்தினால் அதற்கு மொசாம்பிக் நாட்டில் உள்ள சுரங்கத்தை விற்பதற்கு முடிவு செய்துள்ளது. இலுக்கா மைன்ஸ் என்பது உலகில் உள்ள மிகப் பெரிய தாதுமணல் நிறுவனங்களில் ஒன்று. இதற்கு பல்வேறு நாடுகளிலும் சுரங்கங்கள் உள்ளன. சிர்கான் உற்பத்தில் உலகில் முதலிடத்தில் உள்ளது. ஆனால் சமீப காலமாக ஏற்பட்ட விலைகுறைவு போன்ற இதர காரணங்களால் அந்நிறுவனம் மொசாம்பிக் நாட்டில் சுமார் 22500 கோடி ரூபாய் செலவில் அமைத்துள்ள சுரங்கம், தொழிற்சாலை, தளவாடங்கள் அனைத்தையும் விற்பனை செய்ய முடிவு செய்துள்ளது. 22500 கோடி ரூபாய் முதலீட்டில் தொடங்கப்பட்ட தொழிற்சாலை, சுரங்கம் அத்தனையையும் 2500 கோடி ரூபாய்க்கு ஆஸ்திரேலியாவில் உள்ள ஒரு நிறுவனத்திற்கு விற்பதற்கு சம்மதம் தெரிவித்துள்ளது. ஆனால் விற்பனை இன்னும் முடிவாகவில்லை. ஆஸ்திரேலியா நிறுவனம் அதிலும் விலை குறைத்து கேட்கிறது.

உலகில் ஏகபோகமாக  இந்த தொழிலில் இருந்த நிறுவனங்கள் எல்லாம் இந்தியாவில் தாதுமணல் வளர்ச்சியால் தொடர்ந்து நஷ்டம் கண்டு வந்தன. இவைகள் எல்லாம் பெரும் தொகையை செலவு செய்து தாது மணலுக்கு எதிராக இந்தியாவில் திட்டமிட்ட பிரச்சாரத்தையும், பொய் புகார்களையும், பொய் வழக்குகளையும் உண்டாக்கி வருகின்றன. இவற்றின் பின்னணியில் வெளிநாட்டு நிறுவனங்களின் சதி உண்டு என இந்திய தாது மணல் உற்பத்தியாளர் சங்கம் கடந்த நான்கு வருடங்களாக கூறி வரும் புகார் உண்மை தான் என்பது ஊர்ஜிதமாகிறது.

Rare Earths – Materials for the 21st Century

Heard of praseodymium and dysprosium? They sound like tongue twisters, don’t they? They’re a part of our daily lives – right inside our gaming consoles, mobile phones and digital cameras! So let’s see how they affect us.

Rare Earth Minerals

Praseodymium and dysprosium join 15 other elements in a group called ‘rare earth minerals’. They are actually not rare. They are quite widely spread out on the earth’s crust. Here’s a picture of the periodic table with the rare earths marked:

pic

Rare Earths All Around Us

Rare earths are widely used in making electronic devices, like your computers and laptops, mobile phones, digital cameras and portable music players.

Let’s look inside a digital camera. The lens is made from a special glass that has lanthanum or lutetium in it, so that the images have no distortion. The electronic circuit board has many tiny magnets in it, made from neodymium, samarium and many other rare earths. Europium and terbium are what help make the display look so colourful. All of these elements, in just one device!

Combinations of rare earth oxides are also used to make high temperature superconductors, which are used in MRI and maglev trains. And new uses are being discovered every day.

Rare Earth Diplomacy

Few of us can imagine going out today without our mobiles and music players. We can’t imagine a house without an LCD TV or an office without laptops. In the future, we’ll have even more electronic gadgets. That means we need more supplies of rare earths.

However, concentrated ores of these minerals are quite rare. They are often found with thorium, a radioactive element. Because of this, mining and refining these elements is both expensive.

Today, 97% of all rare earths are mined in China, from the Gobi desert.

This makes countries which have many electronics industries – like Japan, India, Taiwan and South Korea – dependent on imports from China. In recent times, as China develops its own electronics industry, the availability of these minerals to other countries has been reduced.

Today a worldwide search is on for sources of rare earths outside China. India, Brazil, Canada and Australia have reserves, from which thousands of tonnes can be mined. You can see a map of rare earth deposits in India here. Recently our Prime Minister made a big deal with Japan to sell rare earths, and more deals are happening.

As we enter the international year of chemistry, we’re going to hear a lot more of these elements!

Courtesy : http://humantouchofchemistry.com/history.php?action=view&nid=691

 

Will the Honourable Prime Minister implement “Make in India” Scheme in Rare Earth Industry?

China Export Rare Earth Minerals worth about 1500 Crores during 2014. US and Japan imports 35% and 45% of its rare earth requirements from China. Europe, Korea, Vietnam, Russia, Taiwan, Thailand and Canada also importing rare earths from China.

India has 35% of World reserve. But our production is less than 0.001%, as, only Government company alone permitted to produce Rare Earth.

It should be open to the Private Entrepreneurs , so that India will earn huge foreign exchange by way of export, in addition to Generation of lot of new employment.

It is time to implement the Honourable Prime Minister’s “Make in India” scheme in this rare earth industry. Will the Honourable Prime Minister implement the same.?

Ref : http://investorintel.com/technology-metals-intel/chinese-rare-earths-exports-dramatically-decrease-while-global-demand-for-rare-earth-products-increase/

Experts call for more exploration of rare earth sector

Experts call for more exploration of rare earth sector

Press Trust of India  |  Thiruvananthapuram 

Rare earth experts have called for more exploration of the sector to bridge the demand-supply deficit of these elements due to increasing needs the world over.

India has enormous potential in the sector as it has a long coastline rich in deposits but it has to ramp up its indigenous production, Prof Sidney J L Ribeiro, Institute of Chemistry, Sao Paulo State University, UNESP, Brazil said.

In this regard, he said private sector can play a crucial role in managing the demand-supply deficit.

Prof Stefan Lis, Head, Rare Earth Department, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland, said since 2010 there was a big gap in production of rare earth elements and demand due to increasing needs, especially for magnets and phosphorous.

Ribeiro said China retains 90 per cent of Rare Earth business globally.

“Rare Earths are very important for critical applications and every country has been focusing on the ways and means to get rare earth minerals,” he said.

V Subramanian, Director of Tamil Nadu based V V Minerals, one of the major players in heavy minerals in the country, said more exploitation of rare earth minerals would trigger a huge manufacturing revolution in the country.

These rare earth elements were very critical components in solar cells, magnets besides windmills, motors, automobiles and defence electronics, he said.

India has the highest monazite reserve in the world with 11.39 million tonnes.

“Monazite is the richest rare earth raw material available in the world with close to 60-65 per cent of total rare earths,” he said.

Though, public sector IRE is dealing with rare earth for more than 50 years now, ‘they are hardly contributing to it.’

While India was making efforts to increase production of heavy minerals such as monazite and rare earth elements, these fall short of present requirements, he said.

“The shortfalls are also because private companies are barred from producing monazite, due to its applications in nuclear power production, with public sector companies, such as Indian Rare Earths Ltd, being dominant producers in India,” he added.

Stressing the need for achieving self-reliance in this critical sector, he said with limitations of public sector units in matching global standards of production, it was time to permit private sector entities to process monazite from their existing facilities.

The experts were addressing a three-day International Conference on Science, Technology and Applications of Rare Earths, which concluded here yesterday.

Source : http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/experts-call-for-more-exploration-of-rare-earth-sector-115042600388_1.html

தாது மணல் பிரச்சனை என்பது உள்நோக்கம் உள்ளது

மோனோசைட் என்னும் அணுசக்திக்கான அரிய மணல் சைனாவில் விலை குறைவாக கிடைப்பதால் இந்தியா 2004-ல் இருந்தே உற்பத்தியை நிறுத்தி விட்டது – பாராளுமன்றத்தில் மத்திய அமைச்சர் தகவல்

சைனாவில் விலை குறைவாக மோனசைட் கிடைக்கும் போது இந்தியாவில் இருந்து சட்டவிரோதமாக தாது மணலை கடத்த வேண்டிய அவசியம் இல்லை.

தாது மணல் பிரச்சனை என்பது உள்நோக்கம் உள்ளது என்பதை இந்த செய்தி நிரூபிக்கிறது.

Source : http://www.dinamani.com/india/2015/04/28/%E0%AE%85%E0%AE%A3%E0%AF%81%E0%AE%9A%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%A4%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%95%E0%AF%8D%E0%AE%95%E0%AE%BE%E0%AE%A9-%E0%AE%85%E0%AE%B0%E0%AE%BF%E0%AE%AF-%E0%AE%AE%E0%AE%A3%E0%AE%B2%E0%AF%8D-%E0%AE%87%E0%AE%A8%E0%AF%8D/article2786358.ece Dinamani news

 

மோனோசைட் உள்ள மணலை பிரிக்காமல் கப்பலில் அனுப்ப முடியாது – மும்பை அணுசக்தி துறை துணைத்தலைவர் திரு.பட்டாச்சார்யா தகவல்

மோனோசைட் பிரித்தெடுக்கும் போது தோரியம், யுரேனியம் போன்றவை கிடைக்கிறது. இதனை பிரித்தெடுப்பது மத்திய அரசு துறைகளில் மட்டுமே உள்ளது. இதனால் வேறு யாரும் இதனை பிரித்தெடுக்கவோ, கடந்தவோ முடியாது. அது போன்று கடத்தல் எதுவும் நடக்கவில்லை. மோனோசைட்  உள்ள மணலை பிரிக்காமல் கப்பலில் அனுப்ப முடியாது. துறைமுகத்தில் ரேடியேசனை வைத்து கண்டுபிடித்து விடுவர். இதனால் இதில் தவறு நடக்கவும் வாய்ப்பு கிடையாது – மும்பை அணுசக்தி துறை துணைத்தலைவர் திரு.பட்டாச்சார்யா தகவல்

நன்றி : தினமலர் (07.04.2015 நெல்லை பதிப்பு)

dinamalar - 7.4.15